Message Board>
Login  |  Register

reading

tyger917
1 post
Nov 21, 2008
7:27 AM
Is it possible to read for two people involved in thethe same situation and come up with two different answers? A different answer for each I mean.

Last Edited on 24-Nov-2008 7:18 AM

Cole~eazy
11 posts
Nov 22, 2008
5:08 PM
Well we talking two people in mirror situations meaning they each have the same situation but in their own lives..if so than YES. Each of us is on our own path...so what works for one will not work for another. However if its two people IN the same situation(like a couple) then YES! One person needs to realize something within the other. Two people are pretty much always going to get different reading because we are each on a path. Sometimes though that being said readings cross paths. It's all a little fuzzy to say completely.
YoungJae
8 posts
Nov 22, 2008
7:46 PM
Yes. Don't forget--aside from all little variables and "answers"--that you can get some many answers to any question or situation, but it's always up for aspects of perception, interpretation, and your own understanding. Anything can go more than one ways.
tyger917
2 posts
Nov 24, 2008
7:21 AM
sorry i reread my post and it was a little confusing. Yes what i ment was two people involved in the same situation together and both be given different information on what path they should take. One may be told that they should work things out and the other be told it is best to move on for example. I also wanted to know if this could change say daily? I know our choices affect everything so the reading we got yesterday may not be the same as if we were to get one today, is this true?
Cole~eazy
13 posts
Nov 24, 2008
4:33 PM
YES! this will so change daily. Our emotions, perceptions, and everything shifts daily. (which is probably one reason why meditation/mantras ARE so important). Everyday you get up influenced by dreams, if your toast burns, if you hair looks good, if the song that played while you got your first kiss plays on the radio and what not all affect you and thus effect your energies. Which is another reason balance and thus meditation plays a part. These energies are sent out and alter the finished product to some extent. Which is why people are SO shocked when things don't work out in their favour. I call this the "love effect". In readings the number one question I get is about love and relationships, BUT if you stay at home and don't do anything about your relationship status THEN SUPRISE you will not find love so easily. Likewise, if I tell you "hey go have some coffee next thursday" but you decide NOT TO...then yes don't be suprised if you don't get the love I see for you. I call it the love effect because one the effects are often reflected MORE in love and relationships(being thats peoples #1 question) and two if you don't love yourself and the universe it wont love you back. So when you (as a reader) sees something good and then a week later tell the client "hey its changed". Well if she/he was really "bad" two days ago OF COURSE its changed. Thats the mystical aspect of events not coming into play. The LOGICAL aspect is there are only so many cards in a deck. What are the chances each card will hit the exact same position every time they are cast. SO LOGICALLY the message will be different as well. The IMPORTANT thing is to ask yourself and thus the client, "what works for you?" "what feels TRUE to your core". People come in and out for a reason SO its quiet possible one party needs to nail the final nail in that relationship in order for them to TRULEY see something about themselves and their heart. The same way one party may need to prepare themselvs to move on and see something about themselves, the partner they are leaving, and what they want around the corner. Loss and gain each hold a lesson, as long as you throw some psyche into it and understand nothing remains the same for too long WILL help you and your people in the long run.

 

 

 

Copyright © 2004-2010

Celestial Esscents Enterprises, Clarksville, TN

All Rights Reserved

Last Updated July 14, 2010